Monday, July 30, 2007

Professional Wisdom of Children II

Kids have a habit of saying things that are so simple and obvious that no adult could possibly have thought of them.

This morning as I was about to let my 2 year old out of the naughty corner, he apologized. He said, "I'm sorry Daddy."

Being the strict disciplinarian in the family (More like being afraid that the disciplinarian might discipline me...) I looked at him and said, "I'm sorry for...," And I honestly expected him to finish the sentence with something like "hitting."

He looked at me and said, "I'm sorry for, five, six." It's truly hard to discipline children when laughing hysterically, and I have a feeling they know that.

Not to be outdone, my four and half year old has been asking questions like, "When I get married will you buy me a pretty dress," and "When will I have a baby in my belly like Mommy?"

But yesterday she really went all out.

"Daddy? why don't Grandma Tammie and Grandpa Art live together like Grandma Shelley and Grandpa Joel?"

This is one of those moments when you wish you could call timeout and check with a child psychologist before answering. I explained that sometimes people who love each other realize that they can be happier when they are not together, so they agree to be apart because they each want the other one to be happy.

To be perfectly honest, I felt like a genius when I came up with that one.

But she had follow up questions.

Two follow up questions.

"If Grandpa and you and Mark and Adam are all out of the house, shouldn't grandma move to a smaller place?"

My mom is never leaving that house- though I've been telling her for four years that it's financially irresponsible to stay there.

"Is grandpa sad that Grandma's not around?"

Honestly- yes.

And it occurred to me that while children haven't learned advanced logic, they intuit basic functions of IQ and EQ at the most fundamental level. They can empathize with others pain, and they can separate emotion from obvious logical conclusions.

It seems that as we learn more complex logic, we also learn to overthink what we intuitively know.

I think the ideal boss may be 4 years old.

-------------------

No rundown this week, but I wanted to share a few recruiting links, and one tech link that could redefine the Internet.

Recruiting
Tech
And just for fun...


Sunday, July 22, 2007

Work Life and Salary

I spoke to 3 candidates this week.
  • Ex-Consultant #1 ("EX1")- She's made up her mind to leave consulting. It's partly a lifestyle move, and also a professional decision not to pursue the the partner track. She was an undergrad Deal analyst with a VC, and now has 4 years of top tier consulting experience.
  • Ex-Consultant #2 ("EX2")- Been at a tier 2 consulting firm for 14 years. No MBA. Associate Partner, and decided it's time to pursue other opportunities.
  • Consultant ("CSLT")- He has strong Media experience, and isn't enough lifestyle pain to take the hit. He looked around and decided to stay.

What struck me about the three was the similarities and differences in their decision making processes.

Here's what they have in common:

  • Consultants
  • A willingness to consider outside opportunities
  • Some experience gauging market feedback

And that's where their paths diverge.

For both EX1 and EX2, consulting had run it's course. They had decided to leave and the sooner the better. Each faced with offers that didn't suit their needs (EX1 had an offer from a company with a questionable future, EX2 spent a lot of time in the bureaucracies of the big companies he hoped to penetrate), and that's where there paths diverged.

EX1 is still a consultant, and she feels that she can balance her full time job and the second job of looking for a job. She's entertaining opportunities, and using her current position as her safety net until the perfect opportunity comes along.

EX2 quit. He spent some time seeing what was out there, and after a bit of "Goldilocks interviewing," decided he hadn't found the job that was "just right." So, he founded a new media startup and leveraged his consulting experience to source a a few CXOs, the technical infrastructure and some angel funding.

CSLT is off the market. he didn't see what he liked, and he decided to go for partner track. I called him last week a potential interview, and he said, "I'd have jumped at it three months ago, but I've decided to stay put. Call me again if something comes up in a year or so."

We also had a few offers out last week. And each candidate follows his course.

The Weekly Roundup 7/22

A lot of stuff caught my eye this week, so let's get to it.

Recruiting/Appointments/Jobs/Worklife-

And

Business-

Technology-

And just for fun-


Monday, July 16, 2007

Weekly Roundup

I've gotten to exchange roles this week. Hawkes Peers has been growing at an exponential pace, and we've begun to hit tipping points for staffing in sourcing, candidate development, client management, & business development.

That means that in addition to managing my clients, I spent the week interviewing new staff for a broad range of positions. It's good to see this stuff from the other side.

This also has taken all of my free time this week, so I'll leave you only with this week's roundup, and have a new content post next week. I'm hoping to have an important interview so keep your eyes peeled.

And without further adieu, The Roundup...

Recruiting, Jobs, Networking, Appointments, and Corporate Culture:


Business & Politics:

Technology:

And One for fun:

  • 15 things that will get you tossed from a casino.

Sunday, July 8, 2007

News From the Front...

I hope you all enjoyed your Independence Day break. Please take a moment to remember that the freedom we enjoy everyday, and celebrate on the Fourth of July would not be possible without the brave men and women of the military, who's sacrifice is the bedrock of our freedom.

Back in the real world... I got two calls this week from now-former candidates.

The first, a 33 year-old former consultant found himself always a bridesmaid in the interview process trying to leave Consulting for Industry with 2 years of experience as an EM. He was calling to tell me that he'd been named president of a key BU within a major media conglomerate, where he has been growing through the ranks over the last 4 years.

The other was from a candidate I had been working closely with. he was calling to tell me he was about to turn down the offers he had received through my efforts, and accept a position with a small start-up you might have heard of which rhymes with "Foogle."

What struck me about the dichotomy between these conversations, aside from the irony of their temporal proximity, is that they represent two distinct experiences in the transition from Consulting to Industry. The former actually benefited from being unable to leave consulting on the timetable he set for himself. The latter was ideally positioned to parlay his consulting experience into his ideal position on his own timetable.

Below is his account of the process:
"I always knew I had no interest in the partner track. Despite ratings of "Consistently Outperforms" and successive promotions at the earliest review, I had no interest in making a career out of consulting.

When I finished my MBA at HBS, I realized that I had a lot of "best-in-class" metrics on my resume, with no hands on experience, and consulting was the best way to gain exposure to a broad array of functions and industries in a hands-on environment. Having spent over a year as a Case Team Leader, I knew that i had no interest in selling engagements, that I had accomplished everything I was going to from a development standpoint, and that I had established expertise in new media, which would serve me well moving into industry.

With marriage on the horizon, I knew that now was the time to go.

In addition to developing a short list of recruiters I wanted to work with (experts like Noah, who's recent placements matched up with my aspirations), I began to actively leverage my network. I went to the Bain's Alumni network, and began to seek out Alumni in my target companies for informational interviews. I used LinkedIn extensively, and searched HBS's alumni site as well. And I began to spend my time talking to people who could help me.

It wasn't long before I was interviewing for multiple positions, and, ultimately, choosing between three offers, each with it's own set of geographic, lifestyle, economic, and professional pros and cons to weigh against each other. So I went into consultant mode, and ran an engagement evaluating my options, and recommending a course of action.

With the process behind me, I couldn't be happier."

The Roundup

Feedback to the links on the right hand side has been pretty favorable, so each week, in addition to my regular blog post, I'll publish "The Roundup." It's a list of Links about the job market, business, or technology which caught my attention this week. Feel free to submit links I may have missed that other readers should see.

Recruiting:

  • A fun story about workplace dress-codes and tattoos. I'm sure it's relevant to most of the consultants out there. :)

Business:

Technology:

And one that can't be categorized:

Sunday, July 1, 2007

Location, Location, Location, right?

I'm actively working on three searches right now...
  1. A Corporate Development position for a junior i-banker with media experience located in New York metro
  2. A position for a strategic marketing professional with SSD experience for a position in Boise
  3. A Corporate Strategy role for an elite consultant with telecom experience located in suburban Denver

So which is the easiest position to fill?

I bet most of you would say #1... It's a junior position, and it's in a major metro area, so there are more available qualified candidates. Right?

As a recruiter, the added value which I bring to clients comes in one of two forms. For the clients in Boise and Denver, the biggest draw is the ability to quickly identify qualified candidates amenable to their geography. In a major metro area, most companies can get thousands of carbon copy candidates through LinkedIn, job boards, or corporate alumni networks. I have to bring them candidates who can separate themselves from the pack.

The job in Boise is the toughest because it's the least generic. Though they are flexible on location (Bay Area and virtual locations are possible), the successful candidate must have significant experience from of the company's competitors to have enough industry knowledge to qualify. There are somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 such people in the world, and all of them are currently employed in metro areas bigger than Boise. Talk about a needle in a hay stack.

Denver is a tier 2 metro area, with no shortage of people willing to go there, and a not-so-small population of ex-pats looking to return "home." The must haves in the job description are extremely specific, but the pool of candidates who meet the checklist is not nearly as limited as the Boise pool. Additionally the spec leaves a spectrum of qualifies candidates, and I can bring value by presenting only the top 10% of the candidates.

What all of these jobs share is the demand for industry exposure as opposed to a generalist background. The New York i-banker has to have deal experience in Media/Telecom. The Boise strategic marketer needs to have hands on experience with the specific product, or two years as a management consultant dedicated exclusively to semiconductor marketing. The Denver Corporate Strategy position requires 2-4 years of Management Consulting with Telecom experience, and preferable an undergrad degree as an Electrical Engineer.

The moral of the story? There are jobs out there for the smartest kid in the room, looking for an MBA from HBS and 2 years of generalist consulting. But for most positions, location is not as important as industry specific engagement exposure which will allow you to distance yourself from the generalist pack.